Summary

This proposal suggests permanently burning 50% STON tokens that were previously repurchased by the treasury through buyback operations. Instead of holding these tokens in treasury wallets, they should be sent to an unrecoverable burn address to remove them from circulation. This would reduce total supply and strengthen the long-term value proposition of the STON ecosystem.

Motivation

Treasury buybacks are typically used to support the token economy and demonstrate confidence in the project. However, when repurchased tokens remain in treasury wallets, they can potentially be reintroduced into circulation later, which creates uncertainty about the effective supply.

Burning these tokens would provide stronger transparency and commitment to supply reduction. It signals that the DAO prioritizes long-term scarcity and aligns incentives with token holders by ensuring that buybacks lead to a permanent reduction in circulating supply.

Details

1. Identify 50% STON tokens acquired through treasury buyback programs.
2. Burn 50% tokens throw Minter.ton.org
3. Publish the transaction hash publicly so the community can verify the burn on-chain.
4. Update official documentation and tokenomics dashboards to reflect the reduced total supply.

This process should be executed in a transparent and auditable way so that the community can confirm the burn directly on-chain

Impact

Benefits

• Permanent reduction in total token supply
• Stronger market confidence and transparency
• Clear signal that buybacks are intended for deflation rather than treasury accumulation

Risks / Trade-offs

• The treasury permanently loses these tokens and cannot use them later for incentives, liquidity, or ecosystem funding
• Reduced treasury flexibility in future strategic decisions

Additional context

Token burning has been widely used in crypto ecosystems to strengthen token economics and create predictable supply dynamics.

Implementing burns for treasury buybacks ensures that buybacks achieve their intended economic effect rather than simply relocating tokens to another wallet.

Small strategic thought from the strange world of token economics:

burning tokens is psychologically powerful because humans react strongly to scarcity signals. The actual economic impact depends on demand, but the narrative power is real.

Markets run on math... and stories.

In your case there's also a political dimension

-DAOs are basically miniature digital governments. A proposal like this forces the community to decide whether treasury power should prioritize flexibility or hard scarcity. Different econ'stems pick different

↓

philosophies.