Abstract
This proposal, submitted by Inetovsky, requests reimbursement for 400 TON spent on a mandatory DAO verification procedure. This verification was a necessary step to maintain transparency, prevent abuse, and ensure legitimate participation in DAO governance processes. The proposal argues that this check was crucial for compliance and continued engagement within the DAO framework. Approval would prevent contributors from being financially burdened by required procedures, fostering a healthier and more transparent DAO environment without introducing risks.
Description
Summary
DAO Moderation Check by Inetovsky. This proposal covers the reimbursement of 400 TON spent on a mandatory DAO verification procedure.
Motivation
DAO requires periodic moderation and identity verification checks to maintain transparency, prevent abuse, and ensure that only legitimate contributors interact with governance processes. This verification was necessary to proceed with DAO-related operations and ensure compliance with established rules. Without completing this check, further participation in governance would be blocked.
Details
The proposal requests compensation for the completed DAO moderation check performed by Inetovsky. The check required a payment of 400 TON, which served as the verification fee for DAO compliance. No technical complexity or dependencies are involved — it is a straightforward reimbursement for the fixed validation cost.
Impact
Approving this proposal ensures that contributors are not financially penalized for required governance procedures. This supports a healthy DAO environment, encourages transparent participation, and confirms that DAO-mandated checks are properly recognized. No risks or trade-offs are expected, as this is a simple reimbursement aligned with current DAO operations.
Additional context
No additional materials or references are required.
Timeline
0comments
Comments
Votes
Wallet | Voting power | Vote | |
|---|---|---|---|